Good Monday Morning

It’s February 27th. Stop using your air fryer if you own one of the two million that have been sold by Cosori. Their website has details.

Today’s Spotlight is 960 words — about 3 1/2 minutes to read.

Spotlight On …  AI Cheating

As technology advances, AI cheating – making false documents, taking tests, or manipulating video footage – is a growing concern. The potential for AI to be misused grows as it gets more sophisticated, and society is ill-prepared.

Not Photographs, But Still Art

Most focus is on tools such as ChatGPT and Bing’s new chatbot search engine, but this month Jos Avery’s photography secret emerged. He maintained an Instagram following based on his unique portrait photography. But instead of a camera, he used Midjourney, a publicly accessible image model and edited the results. Avery claims he typically creates 85 images per editable image he then manipulates in software such as Adobe Lightroom or Photoshop. Many photographers are furious, but as one observer pointed out, he is simply another artist.

Yet Avery was perpetuating AI cheating, potentially taking someone else’s work and using it to create his own art. Many photographers consider that copyright infringement. Stock image giant Getty Images has accused Stability A.I. of using more than 12 million Getty photographs to train its artificial intelligence image generator, Stable Diffusion.

Video Challenges Include Porn 

AI generative models can create realistic-looking video of someone doing or saying something they never did, or manipulate an existing video to change its meaning. That can be a boon for a movie or television project with the actor’s approval. Harrison Ford, 80, told Variety that his upcoming fifth Indiana Jones movie includes footage of him manipulated to make it appear as though he hadn’t aged since he last played the role decades ago.

Deepfakes and AI-generated videos continue to challenge fact checkers and historians. With deepfakes, videos appear real but are actually manipulated to show something that didn’t happen. The technology has been used to create misleading videos of politicians, celebrities, and ordinary people.

Recent years have seen a rise in the popularity of deepfake porn. Through technology, porn producers can create videos apparently featuring celebrities and other public figures, but increasingly also abusing women who aren’t in the spotlight.

This technology, according to activist Mia Landsem, has made it easier for content creators to integrate the faces of non-consenting women into pornography. Those videos further objectify and dehumanize women, often causing psychological distress and reputational damage. One rare government agency that helps, The UK Revenge Porn Helpline, logs thousands of calls each year.

Tricking a Bank’s Voice Authentication

Even audio fakes are causing AI cheating problems. Voice authentication systems are not as secure as other biometrics, leaving criminals an opening using synthesized voices. Writing in Vice last week, Joseph Cox demonstrated how he tricked his bank, which uses voice authentication, to gain access to his account using a synthesized version of his voice. Cox says he needed only five minutes of audio and some software.

3 More Stories to Know

1)  TikTok parent company ByteDance has launched Lemon8 in the US and UK.  The app is a mix of Pinterest and early-Instagram. Videos aren’t allowed, and there’s still plenty of empty categories. The app was downloaded one million times when it was released in Japan last summer.

2) The Justice Department accused Google of destroying records in the government’s antitrust suit against the company. Google employees routinely used an instant-messaging app that deleted chats after 24 hours while discussing sensitive company information. 

3) 14% of Gen Z (aged tweens to mid-20s) are getting their news information from TikTok according to a new analysis by Morning Consult. Nearly half of Baby Boomers and Gen X said they get most news information online from YouTube.

Trends & Spends

Did That Really Happen? — Ted Cruz & the Xbox


Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) stoked more culture wars by saying that “they” were gunning for gas stoves, coffee, and your Xbox. The short version is that Microsoft when the game console updates to be more eco-friendly. Poynter does a fabulous job demonstrating how they fact-checked this misleading statement. I can’t recommend it enough to you.

 Following Up — Prompt Engineers

We’ve written so much about generative AI for a couple of years now that it’s sometimes hard to remember that half of adults don’t know (or maybe care) what it is. Meanwhile, the hot new trend in tech job circles might be “prompt engineers”–people who have the skills to devise unique, effective prompts that coax generative AI models to output something close to what was hoped for or planned.

Protip — Don’t Accidentally Share Your Location

Not sharing your location with every app maker and their marketing partner can be inexplicably difficult. Wired gives some great advice about how to protect yourself.

Screening Room —  Canada’s Humanitarian Coalition

Science Fiction World — Starlink’s Satellite Broadband

It’s touted as broadband anywhere on land for about $200 per month. That’s the price of SpaceX’s Starlink service. The company also has maritime products starting at $5,000 monthly and aviation products at $25,000 monthly.

Coffee Break —  What Historical Icons Might Look Like Today

This artist disclosed that the images are doctored with software. See Al Capone, Ben Franklin, and Babe Ruth among other historical icons reimagined in today’s time. 

Sign of the Times

Good Monday Morning

It’s February 13th, which means it’s Galentine’s Day, which is a real thing according to Merriam-Webster. We’re off next week for President’s Day and back with you on the 27th.

Today’s Spotlight is 900 words — about 3 1/2 minutes to read.

Spotlight On …  Online Speech

This month, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in two cases related to online speech regulation. Both deal with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which essentially shields online services from liability for content posted by their users.You may have heard about this battle as publisher vs platform. The argument revolves around whether online platforms, such as Google and Facebook, are publishers, responsible for all posts, or if they are platforms, responsible for their own content, but not for other people’s.

Horrifying Examples of Online Speech

It’s common for large platforms to get criticized for content posted by others. People livestream suicides or even murders. Many tech companies point out that when they remove these posts automatically, hundreds and sometimes thousands of people, change the underlying video just enough to upload the terrible images again. They’ll say that all speech is protected. And they’ll likely point out that you and I won’t get the opportunity to post content if doing so creates liabilities for them.  Now imagine that you are personally responsible for whatever you write in a Wikipedia edit or moderate in a Facebook group.

Not Just Social Media

“Without Section 230, Wikipedia could not exist,” Jacob Rogers, associate general counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation, told MIT Technology Review. As a result of Section 230, Wikipedia is immune from liability for any content its contributors post on the site.

Google v Gonzalez on Feb. 21 and Twitter v Taamneh specifically address how ISIS recruits people, but leaves a potential mess around free speech. In a brief submitted in the first case, the Department of Justice argues for protection of online speech, even when the speech could be about deadly issues. It will be difficult for people to post timely content in a world where content must be screened, approved, and then made live. And if Big Tech firms are held liable for what others post, then online speech will be severely restricted. Ultimately that may be what critics of Section 230 want to happen.

1) One quarter of the global population used Facebook daily in December. The company has authorized a $40 billion stock buyback and laid off 11,000 people in the last six weeks. 

2) Discount pharmacy GoodRx agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine after the FTC took action following GoodRx’s disclosure of customers’ health information. Because the FTC doesn’t administer HIPAA, the penalty was relatively low for the publicly traded company that generated $187 million in Q3 revenue, but remains unprofitable.

3) Image diffusion models can produce convincing fake images. However, they remember the real images they were trained on. This can compromise privacy and intellectual property rights. A research team has published an example of extracting those training images from the working model.

Screening Room Northwell Health’s Ferocious Tiger

 Did That Really Happen? — Biden Video Doctored

A gruesome doctored video shows President Biden giving a speech saying brutal things about transgendered people. The video is correct, but the audio was doctored. Biden remains a staunch supporter of LGBTQ rights. 

Following Up — YouTube Music Royalty Scam

Last week’s Spotlight focused on streaming music and how creatives are being squeezed out of traditional royalties. Shortly after we published, Jose Teran pleaded guilty to conspiracy, wire fraud and money laundering for claiming to YouTube that he and his partner owned music they uploaded there from Latin artists including Daddy Yankee, Don Omar, and others. The pair were paid $23 million in royalties, reminding everyone that the money is there, but not for creatives.

Protip — Tracking Packages in Gmail

Tom’s Guide shows you how to enable Gmail’s new package tracking feature using iOS or Android.

Screening Room — Optic 2000 – AI Draws What Visually Impaired People Describe

Science Fiction World — Robot Lifeguards

Beaches in Goa, India, will now supplement human lifesaving efforts with Aurus, a self-driving robot and Triton, an AI-powered monitoring system. The systems will be used to monitor areas that are not cleared for swimming and notify lifeguards if people are present. Those beaches have recorded more than 1,000 rescue incidents in the last two years.

Coffee Break —  WABC on Home Computers (1982)

Here’s a delightful video segment in which WABC in New York tries to explain just who in tarnation would want to buy a home computer for thousands of dollars.

Sign of the Times