I had the opportunity to guest lecture a class of bright minds on Thursday at George Mason University. I’ve learned to make lectures two-way conversations, and those marketing students taught me this:

  • They can think about multiple marketing channels at the same time.
  • They consume prolific amounts of data and their devices of choice are extensions of their personal and professional lives.
  • They are faster online then anyone who grew up without a mobile device, and they use those devices for everything.
  • Email isn’t their killer app or even their go-to form of communication. They live in an instant-on/always-available world.
  • They KNOW that none of this is free. Faced with situations about organizations working together, they instinctively asked about the money trail. That is rare in some meetings of business leaders.

This class was so digital-centric that I had multiple LinkedIn invitations before I arrived home. They will be working for you in the next year or two, but before then, they will be among the audience your organization tries to influence.

More than 90% use Snapchat. Facebook is popular too. Hardly anyone uses Twitter. Their devices have 4″-8″ screens. Sure, they have big monitors too, but NOT for seaching, texting, and other communication utility. If you want to engage them, you’ll need to be where they are and communicating in the way that they access information.

At least four class members were either running startups or working in marketing for an organization.  And they were all undergraduates.

Technology has changed how information is accessed. But it has also created an ever-younger group of savvy consumers and marketers. If you are an organization or community leader who thinks 2007 wasn’t very long ago, then you should reach out to marketing students like these today and listen to them.


Header photo by Crew.co

Your Digital Spotlight for Monday, September 19th.

Unsubscribe

Google and Facebook have ambitious goals. Both reach billions of people. And while giving access to new things, they also give themselves and others access to us. More importantly, they control who has access and in which direction.

You don’t have to like that power in one company’s hand, but we were all free to create the best search engine or social media network. They did it. And a spate of new rules come from their corporate offices each month. None have the power of government or law behind them, but if we want to use their services, we have to play by their rules. And those rules change often.

Some or all of those rules may impact you or your organization. But it’s important for every organization to know that their strategies can be changed or derailed by one simple announcement from either one of these industry giants.

The articles in this issue cover the cancelation of a generous advertising grant program’s upper limits, the tagging of websites with a label called “not secure” if they don’t meet certain guidelines, and even a statement from Facebook that  mobile site speed is important enough and that they might start rejecting your ads if your site takes too long to load.

As these companies make rules that shape the global Internet experience, it’s a great strategy to be vigilant about big changes. Make sure your team has access to people who track changes and can help your organization make fast, appropriate adjustments to its online presence.

 Header photo by William Iven

Features wars are nothing new among competitors, especially in the digital sector. One-upmanship between Google and Apple is legendary. Google was on the receiving end when Microsoft famously blocked Google Chrome users from updating their computer’s Windows system unless they used a non-Google browser.

Today’s battles are fought more often for specific audiences. Snapchat and Facebook are waging one of the more interesting contests around mobile device users (natives, some call them) up to the age of 35. Google or Amazon sometimes appeal to that audience, but Facebook doesn’t want to only be your grandfather’s social media network, and Snapchat is intent on being an immersive part of young lives.

We have three stories for you today from the last week detailing how Facebook’s Instagram product copied a major Snapchat initiative and simultaneously launched a site for people under the age of 21. If you think that can’t be successful, remember that the original Facebook was limited to college students. Snapchat has responded by spending up to $200 million on what might be the first mobile search engine.

As a bonus, we have a great story from the Washington Post about the 98 personal data points you Facebook advertising makes available to advertisers who want to micro-target audiences. I first spoke about micro-targeting more than 10 years ago, and if there is a way to express even more granularity, please let me know, because micro-micro doesn’t work, but conveys the idea.

Consider this: Silver Beacon recently ran ad campaigns targeting people who worked on Capitol Hill for specific legislators. We used the zip codes of Congressional offices to further target those people. If you met the other criteria AND you worked on Capitol Hill, you could see the ads. But we knew that the target audience could see them.

What does this mean for you and your organization? You can micro target too–more than you ever imagined. And now you can target your audience using their mobile device when they are close to your store or a geographic location. Retailer John Wanamaker said that he knew that 50% of his advertising was effective. He just didn’t know which 50%. Today we know what is effective and in nearly real-time.

Talk with us about your strategy if your organization would profit from sending messages to the most appropriate individuals possible. You can email me at george@silverbeaconmarketing.com.

Header image by Greg Rakozy.

Want your own copy of SPOTLIGHT emailed free every Monday morning? Go here:  https://silverbeacon.ongoodbits.com/